![]() |
||||||
| Pacific Media Watch | ||||||
| INDONESIA: Commentary - Assessing Keating's Soeharto statement |
||||||
|
Title -- 5310 INDONESIA: Commentary - Assessing Keating's Soeharto statement Date -- 18 February 2008 Byline -- None Origin -- Pacific Media Watch Source -- The Jakarta Post/Joyo News 15/02/08 Copyright - JP Status -- Unabridged Post a comment on PMW's Right of Reply: PMW feedback pmc@aut.ac.nz Op-ed: ASSESSING KEATING'S SOEHARTO STATEMENT By Louise Williams, former Sydney Morning Herald correspondent in Jakarta Terjemahan (atas jasa "Kataku"): http://66.114.70.144/cgi-bin/terjem.rex?Op-Ed__Assessing_Keating_s_Soeharto_statement__By_Louise_Williams__Ex--80215001 JAKARTA (JP Online/Pacific Media Watch): The former Australian Prime Minister, Paul Keating, has much to be proud of, particularly his visionary efforts to engage a suspicious Australian public with Asia in 1980s and 90s. However, his recent articles in The Jakarta Post -- trumpeting the economic and social achievements of the late President Soeharto, while sweeping aside human rights abuses and corruption -- take a disappointingly narrow view of this nation's recent history. In defending the late President Soeharto's record, Keating takes aim at a "jaded bunch" of Australian journalists; especially those from the Sydney Morning Herald and the ABC. He blames critical reporting by this very small group for Indonesia's unfavorable image in Australia during the Soeharto era. I covered Indonesia for the Sydney Morning Herald from the late 1980s until 1999, so must count myself among the handful to which he refers. Firstly, Keating is right to be dismayed over the mutual distrust which persists between Indonesia and Australia. He is also right to point out that the media plays a large part in shaping public perceptions. However, he makes his argument the wrong way around. The media, in any society, is a reflection of both the prevailing political system and a nation's history. Australia's sometimes raucous and frequently critical media is an integral part of its stable, Western democracy. Australia's past, as a white colonial outpost sitting nervously on the edge of Asia, also weighs heavily on the Australian public's imagination. It could be argued that no two neighbors have so little in common; historically, culturally, religiously, ethnically and -- until Indonesia's recent democratization -- politically. These differences have, certainly, sparked tensions over the years. But, the critical reporting of the then Soeharto regime was a product of these fundamental differences in political models, not the cause of the divide. Australian journalists working within their own media culture have no reason to apologize for pursuing human rights issues and corruption at a time when Indonesian journalists were unable to report freely. Keating may recall that Western nations such as the United States and New Zealand considered the human rights situation sufficiently serious to cut military ties with Indonesia in the early 1990s. Nor should was former President Soeharto be portrayed as a hapless victim of "willful" Australian journalists. The Soeharto government had many blunt tools at its disposal to keep the media in check, including bans on foreign journalists which he used against my newspaper. It is not productive to engage in an argument with Keating about Soeharto's legacy. This is very complex question and cannot be reduced to a glib black and white "Soeharto the father of development" vs "Soeharto the human rights violator". I have traveled from Banda Aceh to the highlands of Papua. I understand and appreciate the importance of poverty alleviation and development under the Soeharto government. But, I also understand the anguish of families of those who died at the hands of his security forces or agent. The debate over Soeharto's place in history will not be easily of quickly settled on these pages. However, it is both inaccurate and one-sided to portray the Australia media as an irresponsible bunch of hacks merely baying for Soeharto's blood. Many Australian journalists who live and work in Indonesia establish a lifelong connection to this country and engage with Indonesia in all its splendor. For journalists this means continuing to report critically when appropriate -- but also recognizing the human interest stories which bring another society to life. Since the fall of the Soeharto regime in 1998, sporadic bilateral tensions have persisted, despite Indonesia's democratization. But, there is cause to be optimistic. The same Australian media organizations and journalists Keating lambastes, reported accurately and compassionately after the Bali bombings; recognizing the Indonesian victims as well as the Australians and acknowledging the extraordinary cooperation since between security forces. Certainly, there is considerable anger at the terrorists in Australia, but Australians and the Australian media is able to distinguish between a small number of extremists and the broader Indonesian public. The Boxing Day tsunami also led to an outpouring of compassion for Indonesia, and the single biggest relief package every pledged by an Australian government. Since the 1980s, much has changed in the region. Asia's economic rise means Australia looks north towards new markets, new democracies and increasing affluent and educated neighbors; not the mass poverty it once feared. Australia's main trade ties are with Asia not Europe and Asian immigration to Australia and the large numbers of Asian students studying at Australian universities mean Australia is no longer the culturally isolated "white tribe of Asia". Those historic tensions which may have informed public opinion in the 1980s and 1990s are slowly breaking down. But, it does take time. Just as it takes time for Indonesia to consolidate it's democracy. The way to move forward is not to look for blame but to get to know each other better. I was in Jakarta on the day Soeharto stepped down and on the day he died; and like so many Indonesians, I had mixed emotions. It was the end of an era, a moment in history. I am now back in Indonesia for two months with 25 young Australian and New Zealand journalism students who are taking part in internship programs with Indonesian and foreign media organizations in Jakarta. The aim is to build a new generation of Australian journalists who understand the importance of an informed engagement with Indonesia -- and who embrace the people behind the headlines. Ironically, it's not unlike the Hawke-Keating Labor government scholarship program for young Australian journalists which began my own engagement with Asia in the 1980s. For that mind broadening start to my career, I will always be grateful. * The writer is a former Sydney Morning Herald journalist, who spent ten years as a foreign correspondent in Asia, including four years in Indonesia from 1996. She is in Jakarta for the Australian Consortium for In-Country Indonesian Studies, a non-profit consortium of universities which supervises foreign students in Indonesia and can be reached at Louise.Williams@uts.edu.au. |
||||||
| +++niuswire
PACIFIC MEDIA WATCH is an independent, non-profit, non-government organisation comprising journalists, lawyers, editors and other media workers, dedicated to examining issues of ethics, accountability, censorship, media freedom and media ownership in the Pacific region. It is now published by the Pacific Media Centre at New Zealand's AUT University. Launched in October 1996, it has links with the Journalism Programme at the University of the South Pacific, Journalism Studies at the University of PNG (UPNG) and the Australian Centre for Independent Journalism (ACIJ), Auckland University of Technology in New Zealand. The website is hosted by the Association of Progressive Communications (APC). © 1996-2008 Copyright - All rights reserved. Items are provided solely for review purposes as a non-profit educational service. Copyright remains the property of the original producers as indicated. Recipients should seek permission from the copyright owner for any publishing. Copyright owners not wishing their materials to be posted by PMW please contact us. The views expressed in material listed by PMW are not necessarily the views of PMW or its members. Recipients should rely on their own inquiries before making decisions based on material listed in PMW. For further information and joining the Pacific Media Watch listserve,
|
||||||