Opinion: Weapon of mass destruction
Title -- 4336 INDONESIA: Opinion: Weapon of mass deception
Date -- 9 March 2004
Byline -- None
Origin -- Pacific Media Watch
Source -- The Jakarta Post, via fbp@igc.org 8/3/2004
Copyright -- JP
Status -- Unabridged
Post a comment on PMW's Right of Reply: www.voy.com/166636/
Opinion: CONTROLLED MEDIA COULD CAUSE MASS DECEPTION
By Thang D. Nguyen, Program Coordinator, United in Diversity Forum
JAKARTA (JP Online/Pacific Media Watch): The media has become a weapon of mass deception. This has happened in two ways: The first is that governments have come to dominate the media, and the second is that too much freedom has made the media irresponsible.
The first case is quite Orwellian in that the media, especially the state-owned media, serves as governments' obedient mouthpieces. For one thing, this means that their news reports are government-friendly. But this also means they cover up scandals in which their bosses are at fault.
As an old saying has it, "never bite the hand that feeds you", and anyone who violates this rule will face consequences: from the loss of their job to threats, imprisonment, family harassment and death. Because of the overwhelming power of the "thought police", many media agencies bite the bullet and hide truthful and objective information from the public.
There has, however, been one exception recently: the BBC's reporting, much of
which was done by the brave, controversial Andrew Gilligan, accusing Downing
Street of "sexing up" the Iraq dossier that led the UK into the U.S. war on
Iraq. In January, the BBC's ex-chairman Gavyn Davies and ex-director general
Greg Dyke quit in defense of the corporation's editorial independence.
Before announcing his resignation, Dyke sent an e-mail to the BBC staff in
which he wrote: "... the management of the BBC was heavily criticized [for the
Gilligan reports]. We need closure to protect the future of the BBC, not for
you or me but for the benefit of everyone out there. Throughout this affair my
sole aim as director general of the BBC has been to defend our editorial
independence and to act in the public interest."
It is a shame that Dyke resigned; it is Prime Minister Tony Blair who should
have resigned. It is also a shame that this is happening to the BBC, which has
worldwide respect for its independent news services. It sounds paradoxical,
but the reports on the Iraq war from the government-funded BBC were much more
objective and truthful than the reports from the privately owned CNN or --
much worse -- Fox News.
The second case in which the media becomes a weapon of mass deception is when
it fails to perform responsible journalism. What is responsible journalism?
It is the responsibility of media professionals -- whether they be reporters,
correspondents, producers, editors, managing directors, chief executive
officers or chairmen -- to ensure that the public receives accurate facts and
objective information in a timely manner.
But more than that, responsible journalism means that media professionals are
responsible for detecting, investigating and reporting news that has
life-and-death impacts on the lives of people -- hence the term investigative
journalism.
Often associated with Enron-like cases, Lewinsky-like affairs or Watergate-like scandals, investigative journalism seems to be disappearing, and some journalists have become irresponsible.
Under totalitarian, Communist or other undemocratic societies in which the
media is state-controlled or publicly funded, it might be understandable that,
as much as journalists want to investigate and report truthful stories to the
public, they cannot for fear that they or their families will be endangered by
either the state, influential businesspeople or other powers that be.
Sadly, however, irresponsible journalism is happening in democratic countries
in which the media enjoys not only the right to report freely but also to
investigate into and blow up scandals.
A case in point is the cover-up of and the much belated reports on the bird
flu that has caused deaths and led to the slaughter of millions of chickens
throughout Asia. The outbreak first revealed itself as early as last August
when thousands of chickens started to die in Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam, and
has since spread to Cambodia, China, Japan, Laos, Pakistan, South Korea and
now the U.S.
The Thai public was uninformed of this epidemic until the government ordered
a cull of infected chickens roughly two months after thousands of Thai
chickens had already died of the flu.
Likewise, the Indonesian public was kept in the dark until the end of last
month when the news was no longer concealable. The Indonesian government then
went public with the bad news and ordered a mass cull of its chickens, after
citing inadequate funds and insisting that culling would not be effective and
doing it "would certainly reduce (its) poultry population drastically".
Where was the media all this time? In Thailand, the theory is that the media
is quite scared of the Thaksin government, which is influenced by powerful
businesses such as feed producer Charoen Pokphand Group (CP Group). But where
does that leave the Indonesian media, which since the end of the Soeharto
era has gotten quite a lot of freedom of the press -- if not too much?
If the media joins governments and their intelligence agencies in failing --
intentionally or otherwise -- to provide the public with timely, accurate and
truthful information, who else can we turn to?
When the media acts as governments' tools of deception or are irresponsible,
they are as dangerous as weapons of mass destruction.
These are personal views and do not necessarily represent the views of the
United in Diversity Forum.
PACIFIC MEDIA WATCH is an independent, non-profit, non-government organisation comprising journalists, lawyers, editors and other media workers, dedicated to examining issues of ethics, accountability, censorship, media freedom and media ownership in the Pacific region. Launched in October 1996, it has links with the Journalism Program at the University of the South Pacific, Bushfire Media based in Sydney, Journalism Studies at the University of PNG (UPNG), the Australian Centre for Independent Journalism (ACIJ), Auckland University of Technology in New Zealand, and Community Communications Online (c2o).
© 1996-2004 Copyright - All rights reserved. Items are provided solely for review purposes as a non-profit educational service. Copyright remains the property of the original producers as indicated. Recipients should seek permission from the copyright owner for any publishing. Copyright owners not wishing their materials to be posted by PMW please contact us. The views expressed in material listed by PMW are not necessarily the views of PMW or its members. Recipients should rely on their own inquiries before making decisions based on material listed in PMW. Please copy appeals to PMW and acknowledge source.
For further information, inquiries about joining the Pacific Media Watch listserve, articles for publication, and giving feedback contact Pacific Media Watch at:
E-mail: delaro@clear.net.nz or pcronau@hotmail.com Fax: (+649) 3787542 or (+612) 9660 1804
Mail: PO Box 9, Annandale, NSW 2038, Australia
or PO Box 78028, Grey Lynn, Auckland 1002, New Zealand
Website: www.pmw.c2o.org
Return to Pacific Media Watch